Close Menu
Indian Textile Journal
  • Home
  • Textile Machinery
    • Allied Equipment and Accessories
    • Automation
    • Dyeing, Processing & Finishing
    • Knitting
    • Printing
    • Spinning
    • Weaving
  • Tech Textiles
  • Sustainability
  • Resources
    • Trade Fair
    • Events
    • Videos
  • Interview & Opinion
  • Subscribe Now
  • Advertise
  • Digital
  • Apparels & Garments
  • Fibres & Raw Materials
  • Home Textiles
  • Industry Update
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Indian Textile Journal
Epson
  • Home
  • Textile Machinery
    • Allied Equipment and Accessories
    • Automation
    • Dyeing, Processing & Finishing
    • Knitting
    • Printing
    • Spinning
    • Weaving
  • Tech Textiles
  • Sustainability
  • Resources
    • Trade Fair
    • Events
    • Videos
  • Interview & Opinion
  • Subscribe Now
  • Advertise
  • Digital
  • Apparels & Garments
  • Fibres & Raw Materials
  • Home Textiles
  • Industry Update
Indian Textile Journal
Home » Maha HC stays show-cause notice to 62 textile units
Industry Update

Maha HC stays show-cause notice to 62 textile units

By July 14, 20202 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Copy Link

The Bombay high court (HC) recently stayed notices issued by the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) to 62 textile units in Malegaon that refused to grant consent to operate the units. The units are engaged in sizing of yarn used for manufacturing of grey cloth. The bench also restrained the regional offices of MPCB from taking any coercive steps, such as disconnection of electricity, water and basic amenities, against the units.

MPCB had issued the notices primarily on the grounds that the 62 units were located in non-conforming zones, and asked the owners of the units to submit adequacy reports either from the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) or the Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay.

The unit owners were also asked to submit no-objection certificates issued by the city engineer of the Malegaon municipal corporation with recommendation to operate the industry at their present location, as a pre-condition for granting consent to operate.

The unit owners moved HC contending that the notices were illegal, arbitrary and oppressive. Their counsel claimed that they had not violated any of the conditions imposed while granting consent to operate.

The bench found substance in the argument of the petitioners. It said MPCB has the powers to direct closure or regulate operation of an industry under section 33A of the Water Act and section 31A of the Air Act, but these powers are subject to provisions of the respective Acts, and the authority will have to follow other provisions of the Acts, before invoking the powers.

Previous ArticleFlipkart invests Rs 260 crore in Arvind Fashions’ arm
Next Article SANITIZED TecCenter receives IAC certification

Related Posts

VIRGIO names Hansa Nigam as Chief Marketing Officer

July 7, 2026

Global trade and technical collaboration in textile sector                

July 7, 2026

Italian textile machinery leads sector revival through innovation and sustainability

July 2, 2026
Recent Posts
  • Cotton research attracting high achieving undergraduates
  • Yamuna Machine and MANTRA to develop indigenous geo-grid coating line
  • VIRGIO names Hansa Nigam as Chief Marketing Officer
  • Global trade and technical collaboration in textile sector                
  • Expanding the horizons of premium stretch warp knitting with KARL MAYER’s HKS 2-SE
  • Italian textile machinery leads sector revival through innovation and sustainability
  • Weave The Future launches national innovation challenge to tackle textile waste
  • Indian cotton sector in play
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

SISTER PUBLICATIONS

Construction World Equipment India Industrial Product Finder Infrastructure Today

© 2026 Indian Textile Journal. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.