|
In modern high speed sewing machine
fabric and sewing thread is subjected to complex kinematics and dynamic
conditions [1]. The speed at which sewing thread passes through
the needle eye can reach 140-150 km/hr and at the moment at which the thread
is caught by the sewing hook, the speed reaches 2000m/sec [2].
Such speed applies stress on the fabric and sewing thread. This strain is
the cause of susceptible defects to the seam line during seaming, resulting
in deterioration of the seam quality.
Seams are to have satisfactory appearance and serviceability from quality
point of view [3]. The prime contributors in this matter are the
fabric properties [4]. Shear rigidity is one of the most
important fabric properties [5]. Correct selection of fabric
shear rigidity requires consideration of their performance properties during
sewing as well as their performance in the completed garments under
conditions of wear [6].
In 2004, Lam & Postle claimed that fabric shear rigidity affected the
seam quality [7]. In the same year, Hunter & Fan argued that
fabric shear rigidity affected the clothing fit and appearance [8].
In 2003, Pavlinic & Gersak investigated the relation between fabric
shear rigidity and seam quality [4]. The authors corroborate that
fabric shear rigidity has immense impact on seam quality, especially the
seam appearance. In 2002, Gersak asserted that seam quality also depended on
fabric shear rigidity [9]. In 1999, Mori, Haga & Takagishi
discussed that fabric shear rigidity have impact on fabric handle that
ultimately affected the quality of the garment [10].
A literature review of above showed that some researchers, however, have
queried the claimed benefits of shear rigidity and whether shear rigidity
provides opportunities for required seam quality. However the above review
showed that little empirical research has been done on the effect increasing
the fabric shear rigidity on seam quality. Thus based on statistical
analysis, the authors' research aims at better understanding on the effect
of shear rigidity on seam quality.
Experimental
Materials
Plain weave cotton fabrics were selected for the study. The details of
fabric samples used are given in Table I.
Table 1. Fabric Details
| Fabric Sample |
Weave |
Material |
Ends/cm |
Picks/cm |
| 1 |
Plain |
Cotton |
32 |
18 |
| 2 |
Plain |
Cotton |
39 |
26 |
| 3 |
Plain |
Cotton |
46 |
28 |
| 4 |
Plain |
Cotton |
24 |
13 |
| 5 |
Plain |
Cotton |
72 |
40 |
| 6 |
Plain |
Cotton |
94 |
48 |
| 7 |
Plain |
Cotton |
58 |
38 |
| 8 |
Plain |
Cotton |
90 |
50 |
Methods
Fabric shear rigidity measurement
The Kawabata Evaluation System (KES-FB) was used for measuring shear
rigidity of the fabric of the fabric sample 1-8. The shearing test for
measurement of shearing rigidity was conducted by employing the KES-FB1
measuring systems. The parameters obtained from KES-FB1 systems are defined
in Table II. All measurements were repeated for the five samples and
averaged.
Table II. Parameters obtained from KES-FB2
| Properties |
Symbol |
Definition |
Unit |
| Shear
rigidity |
G |
Avg. slope
of the linear region of the shear hysteresis curve +
2.50 shear angle |
gf/cm.deg |
| Shear
hysteresis |
HB |
Avg. width
of shear hysteresis loop at + 0.50 shear angle |
gf/cm |
The consumer has never been having it so
good in the past couple of years.
Sewing
Sewing was done on the industrial sewing machine under particular sewing
conditions that are commercially adopted by apparel manufacturers in apparel
manufacturing. The most conventional plain seam (ISO 1.01.01) was selected
for the study. All samples were sewn by single needle lockstitch (ISO 301)
in both warp and weft direction. The standard sewing conditions maintained
for the test sample were as follows: Machine speed: 3000 stitches per
minute
Linear stitch density: 10 stitches/inch.
Needle size: 11
Sewing thread ticket number: 120
Feed-dog tooth pitch (mm): 1.5
Seam quality analysis
Measurement of the seam quality was done by studying the seam
efficiency, seam puckering. Seam efficiency was calculated using the
following formula [9]:
Seam Strength Tensile (%)
Seam efficiency (%) =
X 100
Fabric Tensile Strength
Seam pucker was determined by measuring the difference in fabric and
seam thickness under a constant compressive load. The seam thickness strain
was calculated using the formula [11]:
Thickness Strain (%) = (ts-2t)/2tX 100
[Where, ts= Seam thickness, t= fabric thickness]
Results analysis and discussion
Results of shear rigidity of fabric samples
The shear rigidity of fabric samples in warp and weft direction is
recorded in Table III.
Table III. Shear rigidity properties.
| Fabric Sample |
Warp Shear Rigidity |
Weft Shear Rigidity |
| 1 |
13.25 |
13.32 |
| 2 |
9.03 |
9.23 |
| 3 |
7.70 |
7.71 |
| 4 |
4.63 |
4.89 |
| 5 |
3.00 |
2.87 |
| 6 |
2.58 |
2.28 |
| 7 |
1.36 |
1.01 |
| 8 |
0.96 |
0.08 |
Results of seam quality of fabric
samples
The results of seam efficiency in warp and weft direction of fabric samples
which are sewn under above mentioned sewing condition are recorded in Table
IV.
The results of seam puckering in warp and weft direction of fabric samples
which are sewn under above-mentioned sewing condition are recorded in Table
V.
Graphical representation of fabric shear rigidity and seam quality in
warp direction
The graphical representation between fabric shear rigidity and seam
quality in warp direction are given in Figure I.
In the graphical analysis, it was found that the fabric shear rigidity in
warp direction would be indirectly correlated with seam puckering, thus
showing that increasing the shear rigidity will help to decrease the seam
puckering. It is also observed that fabric shear rigidity also positively
correlated with seam efficiency; however no clear-cut trend was observed in
that case. Thus, the fabric structural property of shear rigidity would
affect the seam quality of the fabric.
Graphical representation of fabric shear rigidity and seam quality in
weft direction
The graphical representation between fabric shear rigidity and seam
quality in weft direction are given in Figure II.
In the graphical analysis, it was found that the fabric shear rigidity in
weft direction would be indirectly correlated with seam puckering, thus
showing that increasing the shear rigidity will help to decrease the seam
puckering. However seam puckering value is higher in weft direction as
fabric shear rigidity is generally lower in weft direction than warp
direction. It is also observed that, fabric shear rigidity also positively
correlated with seam efficiency; however no clear-cut trend observed in that
case. Thus, the fabric structural property of shear rigidity would affect
the seam quality of the fabric.
Conclusion
After experiments, it was found that shear rigidity is higher in warp
direction for plain weave fabrics. It was also found that the fabric shear
rigidity would affect the seam quality of the fabric samples. However shear
rigidity would affect the seam puckering quality of the sample more than
seam efficiency. It implies that the apparel manufacturer should pay more
attention during on shear rigidity of fabrics when less seam puckering is
the considerable requirement as seam quality. Such findings are very useful
for selection of appropriate fabrics for seam efficiency and seam puckering.
References
-
Gersak J & Knez B (1991):
Reduction in Thread Strength as a Cause of Loading in the Sewing
Process, International Journal of Clothing Science & Technology, Vol
3, No. 4, pp 6-12.
-
Solinger J (1961): Apparel
Manufacturing Analysis, New York.
-
Pavlinic D Z & Gersak J (2002):
Design of the System for Prediction of Fabric Behaviour in Garment
Manufacturing Process, International Journal of Clothing Science &
Technology, Vol 6, No.1/2, pp 252-261.
-
Pavlinic D Z & Gersak J (2003):
Investigation of the Relation Between Fabric Mechanical Properties and
Behaviour, International Journal of Clothing Science & Technology,
Vol 5, No. 3/4, pp 231-240.
-
Gersak J, et al (2006): Predicting
Seam Appearance Quality, Textile Research Journal, Vol 76, No. 3, pp
235-242.
-
Behera B K & Sharma S (1998):
Low Stress Behaviour and Sewability of Suiting and Shirting Fabrics,
Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, Vol 23, No. 4, pp 233-241.
-
Lam J K C & Postle, R (2004):
Primary Hand Values Explained, Textile Asia, Vol 35 No. 9, pp 22-24.
-
Hunter L & Fan J (2004): Chapter
6: Fabric Properties Related to Clothing Appearance and Fit, Clothing
Appearance and Fit, pp 89-113.
-
Gersak J (2002): A System for
Prediction of Garment Appearance, Textile Asia, Vol 33, No. 4, pp 31-34.
-
Mori R, Haga, T & Takagishi T
(1999): Mechanical Properties and Fabric Hand of Cotton Fabrics
Subjected to Cellulose Treatment, Journal of the Fiber Science &
Technology, Japan, Vol 55, No.10, pp 448.
Note: For detailed version of this
article please refer the print version of The Indian Textile Journal
November 2007 issue.
Sumit Mandal
Institute of Textiles & Clothing,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Dr Frency Ng
Institute of Textiles & Clothing,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Dr Patric Hui.
Institute of Textiles & Clothing,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong.
|